From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grigsby v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 16, 1916
183 S.W. 143 (Tex. Crim. App. 1916)

Opinion

No. 3957.

Decided February 16, 1916.

Misdemeanor — County Court — Appeal — Jurisdiction.

Where appellant was tried in the Corporation Court and appealed to the County Court where he was fined one hundred dollars, the judgment was final and no appeal lies to this court.

Appeal from the County Court of Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. Nelson Lytel.

Appeal from a misdemeanor; penalty, a fine of $100.

The opinion states the case.

No brief on file for appellant.

C.C. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. — On question of want of jurisdiction: Neubauer v. State, 31 Tex. Crim. 513; Goldman v. State, 35 id., 436; Monroe v. State, 42 id., 277; May v. State, 59 id., 141; Haak v. State, 60 id., 367; Corbett v. State, 70 id., 73; Campbell v. State, 71 id., 300; Lockett v. State, 67 Tex.Crim. Rep., 148 S.W. Rep., 305; Holman v. State, 73 Tex.Crim. Rep., 166 S.W. Rep., 506; Allen v. State, 74 Tex.Crim. Rep., 167 S.W. Rep., 342.


Appellant appealed his case from the Corporation Court to the County Court, in which latter court the case was tried de novo, and a fine of $100 imposed.

Motion is made to dismiss the appeal because this judgment is final, not being in excess of $100. This is a correct motion under article 87 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1911. See 2 vol. Vernon's Crim. Stat., art. 87, and note containing a great number of decisions upon this question. That statute requires finality of judgment in the County Court where the fine is not in excess of $100.

The appeal, therefore, will be dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Grigsby v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 16, 1916
183 S.W. 143 (Tex. Crim. App. 1916)
Case details for

Grigsby v. the State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GRIGSBY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 16, 1916

Citations

183 S.W. 143 (Tex. Crim. App. 1916)
183 S.W. 143

Citing Cases

Colf v. State

Where appellant was charged with unlawfully exhibiting a moving picture under a city ordinance, tried in the…

Zummo v. State

This article shall not be so construed as to embrace any case which has been appealed from any inferior court…