From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 29, 1983
435 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-2372.

July 29, 1983.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Collier County; Charles T. Carlton, Judge.

Peter J. Fryefield, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann Garrison Paschall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's convictions and his sentences in all respects. In addition, we note that appellant has raised the question of whether this case should be remanded so that the trial court may rule on his earlier filed motion for new trial. No remand is necessary here because by filing a timely notice of appeal, appellant effectively abandoned his motion for new trial. State ex rel. Faircloth v. The District Court of Appeal, Third District, 187 So.2d 890 (Fla. 1966); Perez v. City of Tampa, 181 So.2d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Griffith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 29, 1983
435 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Griffith v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL JOSEPH GRIFFITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 29, 1983

Citations

435 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

In re $104,591 in U.S. Currency

For these reasons, as this court has consistently stated, we again hold that the abandonment rule survives…