In Griffith, the Appellate Court interpreted section 13 1/2 of the ROTA as stating that an NPL is prima facie evidence only of the amount due and not of the wilfulness of a responsible officer.
Summary of this case from In re StoeckerNo. 1-92-2518
Opinion filed September 19, 1994.
In Griffith, the Appellate Court interpreted section 13 1/2 of the ROTA as stating that an NPL is prima facie evidence only of the amount due and not of the wilfulness of a responsible officer.
Summary of this case from In re StoeckerFull title:ROSETTA GRIFFITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE et al.…
Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. First Division Order affirmed
Date published: Sep 19, 1994
We agree with plaintiff's contention as to the wilfulness allegation. Based on Griffith v. Department of…
In re Stoecker" The Trustee urges this court to follow the recent decision in Griffith v. Department of Revenue, 266 Ill.…