From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Byrd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION
Aug 10, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv187-KS=MTP (S.D. Miss. Aug. 10, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv187-KS=MTP

08-10-2016

ANTONIO GRIFFITH v. RAYMOND BYRD


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered herein on June 29, 2016, after referral of hearing by this Court, no objections having been filed as to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court, having fully reviewed the same as well as the record in this matter, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the finding of this Court, and the Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with this Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED, this the10th day of August, 2016.

s/ Keith Starrett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Griffith v. Byrd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION
Aug 10, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv187-KS=MTP (S.D. Miss. Aug. 10, 2016)
Case details for

Griffith v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO GRIFFITH v. RAYMOND BYRD

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 10, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv187-KS=MTP (S.D. Miss. Aug. 10, 2016)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Portillo

No binding precedent has addressed whether Mississippi's procedural framework brings it under Martinez and…