From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grievance Adm'r, Attorney Grievance Com'n v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 12, 2008
757 N.W.2d 867 (Mich. 2008)

Opinion


757 N.W.2d 867 (Mich. 2008) GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, State of Michigan, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Patricia COOPER, Respondent-Appellant. Docket No. 135053. Supreme Court of Michigan. December 12, 2008

         Order

         On November 13, 2008, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the September 17, 2007 opinion and order of the Attorney Discipline Board. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the opinion and order of the Attorney Discipline Board and REINSTATE the August 1, 2006 order of dismissal of the Attorney Discipline Board Hearing Panel No. 106. The Attorney Discipline Board erred in holding that the July 29, 2002 fee agreement was ambiguous as to whether the $4,000 minimum fee was nonrefundable. As written, the agreement clearly and unambiguously provided that the respondent was retained to represent the client and that the minimum fee was incurred upon execution of the agreement, regardless of whether the representation was terminated by the client before the billings at the stated hourly rate exceeded the minimum. So understood, neither the agreement nor the respondent's retention of the minimum fee after the client terminated the representation violated existing MRPC 1.5(a), MPRC 1.15(b) or MRPC 1.16(d).

          MARILYN J. KELLY, J. (concurring).

         I concur in the Court's order reversing the opinion and order of the Attorney Discipline Board and reinstating the order of dismissal of the Attorney Discipline Board Hearing Panel No. 106. I write separately in the interest of curtailing future misunderstandings regarding attorney-client fee agreements similar to the one that occurred in this case.

         The following is the relevant part of the fee agreement:

1. Client agrees to pay Attorney a MINIMUM FEE OF $4,000.00$4,000.00 which shall be payable as follows: Retainer

Balance $-0-

          * * *

This MINIMUM FEE shall entitle Client to a combined amount of Attorney and Legal Assistant time computed in accordance with the hourly rate set forth in Paragraph 3 below.

2. Client understands that NO portion of the MINIMUM FEE referred to above is REFUNDABLE, to the client, under any circumstances.

3. Hourly rate: Attorney $195.00

Assistant $______

4. In the event the combined Attorney and Legal Assistant time shall exceed the MINIMUM FEE, Client agrees to pay for such time at the rates set forth in Paragraph 3 above.

         I agree that this agreement is unambiguous because it clearly states that the $4,000 minimum fee is nonrefundable.

         However, counsel might be aided in knowing that the Attorney Grievance Commission believes that fewer grievances would be filed if a different fee agreement were substituted for the agreement used in this case. The commission recommends that the agreement explicitly designate the fee the attorney charges for being hired and state that the fee is nonrefundable under any circumstances. As the commission recommends, counsel may wish to designate the number of hours the attorney will work without additional charge, and specify an hourly rate to be charged thereafter.


Summaries of

Grievance Adm'r, Attorney Grievance Com'n v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 12, 2008
757 N.W.2d 867 (Mich. 2008)
Case details for

Grievance Adm'r, Attorney Grievance Com'n v. Cooper

Case Details

Full title:GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, State of Michigan…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 12, 2008

Citations

757 N.W.2d 867 (Mich. 2008)

Citing Cases

In re O'Farrell

Notwithstanding Kendall, Respondent argues that Indiana law should allow parties to contract for…

Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court v. Hoffman (In re Hoffman)

[¶ 9] Hoffman argues that his $30,000 nonrefundable “minimum fee” was both reasonable under N.D.R. Prof.…