From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gribben v. Hoare

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
May 1, 1907
54 Misc. 245 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)

Opinion

May, 1907.

W.R. Spooner, for appellant.

Samuel Cohen, for respondents.


This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a complaint. The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic's lien and the demurrer is upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The lien was filed by the plaintiff as a laborer against the defendant Hoare as subcontractor, the defendant Zimmerman as contractor and the defendant Gilder as owner of the premises for the improvement of which the labor of the plaintiff was performed. All of the defendants except Hoare demurred to the complaint and are respondents upon this appeal. Section 47 of the Lien Law provides that "In no case shall the owner be liable to pay, by reason of all liens created pursuant to this article, a sum greater than the value or agreed price of the labor and materials remaining unpaid at the time of filing notices of such liens." Laws of 1897, chap. 418. The absence of any allegation in the complaint that any sum was due or remained unpaid from the owner to the contractor, or from the contractor to the subcontractor, is fatal to the sufficiency of the complaint. Ball Wood Co. v. Clark Sons Co., 31 A.D. 356; Siegel v. Ehrshowsky, 46 Misc. 605. The demurrer to the complaint was properly sustained.

GILDERSLEEVE and BRADY, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Gribben v. Hoare

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
May 1, 1907
54 Misc. 245 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)
Case details for

Gribben v. Hoare

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM GRIBBEN, Appellant, v . DENNIS E. HOARE et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: May 1, 1907

Citations

54 Misc. 245 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)
104 N.Y.S. 445

Citing Cases

Ranieri v. Brandenburg

The respect in which it is claimed the complaint is deficient is in failing to allege that at the time the…