From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greyhound Cab, Inc. v. Sewell

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Mar 17, 1937
190 A. 814 (Md. 1937)

Opinion

[No. 54, January Term, 1937.]

Decided March 17th, 1937.

Motor Vehicle Collision — Sudden Stopping

Negligence on the part of the driver of a motor vehicle may be found in an unnecessary stopping of the vehicle without signalling to the rear, even if the owner is ignorant of the presence of another vehicle behind.

The only rule as to the interval to be kept between two vehicles running one behind the other is that of reasonable care under the circumstances, and the mere fact that a vehicle is moving in close proximity to another and keeping up with it does not of itself constitute negligence.

Decided March 17th, 1937.

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (O'DUNNE, J.).

Action by Herman Sewell against the Greyhound Cab, Incorporated, and John D. Wooten. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, OFFUTT, PARKE, SLOAN, MITCHELL, SHEHAN, and JOHNSON, JJ.

Harry O. Levin, with whom was Harold B. Karp on the brief, for the appellant.

Harry K. Lott and Meyer Reamer, with whom was Louis Silberstein on the brief, for the appellee.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Greyhound Cab, Inc. v. Sewell

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Mar 17, 1937
190 A. 814 (Md. 1937)
Case details for

Greyhound Cab, Inc. v. Sewell

Case Details

Full title:GREYHOUND CAB, INCORPORATED, v . HERMAN SEWELL

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Mar 17, 1937

Citations

190 A. 814 (Md. 1937)
190 A. 814

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Dowdy

It is provided by Acts of 1943, Chapter 1007, Section 169(a), Code, Article 66 1/2, Section 169(a): "The…

Kaplan v. Solomon

We think the jury might properly find that the giving of a belated signal was not due care under the…