From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gretz v. Gretz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 2002
298 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-05502

Argued May 24, 2002.

October 21, 2002.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), dated June 4, 2001, as granted the defendant's motion to punish her for civil contempt and directed her incarceration for a period of seven days, commencing on June 25, 2001. By decision and order of this court dated June 26, 2001, enforcement of the order dated June 4, 2001, was stayed pending determination of the appeal.

Marshall S. Goldman, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Fredman Kosan, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Neil A. Fredman and Ellen Jancko-Baken of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is modified by adding thereto a provision suspending the sentence of seven days imprisonment; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the imposition of a seven-day jail sentence for violating the temporary order of protection was excessive. Accordingly, we substitute our discretion for that of the Supreme Court and impose a suspended sentence (see generally Matter of Lewin v. Lewin, 124 A.D.2d 730).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., O'BRIEN, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gretz v. Gretz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 2002
298 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Gretz v. Gretz

Case Details

Full title:RUTH GRETZ, appellant, v. HERBERT GRETZ, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 21, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 508

Citing Cases

Thimm v. Thimm

Here, the Supreme Court properly determined, without a hearing, that the uncontroverted evidence established…