From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gresham v. Leslie

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Jul 20, 1931
50 F.2d 900 (7th Cir. 1931)

Opinion

No. 4542.

June 25, 1931. Rehearing Denied July 20, 1931.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Hammond Division of the Northern District of Indiana; Fred L. Wham, Judge.

Action by Otto Gresham against Harry G. Leslie and another. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer and dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Otto Gresham, of Chicago, Ill., pro se.

Richard P. Tinkham and C.B. Tinkham, both of Hammond, Ind., for appellees.

Before EVANS and PAGE, Circuit Judges, and LINDLEY, District Judge.


The District Court sustained a demurrer and dismissed appellant's complaint charging that appellees, as officers of the Lower House of the Indiana Legislature, had damaged him by reason of their refusal to permit action by the Lower House upon a petition presented by appellant. When filed, the petition was said by appellant to be one for the impeachment of two Indiana circuit court judges, and, fairly considered, it is nothing more. Several times the Supreme Court of Indiana in construing the Constitution and statutes of that state has held that its Legislature is without power to impeach circuit judges. State v. Patterson, 181 Ind. 660, 105 N.E. 228; State v. Redman, 183 Ind. 332, 109 N.E. 184; State v. Dearth, 201 Ind. 1, 164 N.E. 489.

We are bound by that court's interpretation of the laws of the state. Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 21 L. Ed. 394; Douglas v. Noble, 261 U.S. 165, 43 S. Ct. 303, 67 L. Ed. 590; Isaacs v. McNeil (C.C.) 44 F. 32, 11 L.R.A. 254.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Gresham v. Leslie

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Jul 20, 1931
50 F.2d 900 (7th Cir. 1931)
Case details for

Gresham v. Leslie

Case Details

Full title:GRESHAM v. LESLIE et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Jul 20, 1931

Citations

50 F.2d 900 (7th Cir. 1931)

Citing Cases

Zalatuka v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

The construction of the Wisconsin statute by the Wisconsin Supreme Court is binding on this court. Coombes v.…

United States v. Ragen

But the Supreme Court of Illinois has construed the statute, and this court cannot do otherwise than follow…