From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gregory v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 17, 1951
191 F.2d 856 (6th Cir. 1951)

Opinion

No. 11356.

October 17, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville; Roy M. Shelbourne, Judge.

David C. Walls, Matthew O. Henchey, Louisville, Ky., Harry M. Leet, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

C.S. Landrum, Lexington, Ky., J.P. Hamilton, H.T. Lively, Robert E. Hogan, all of Louisville, Ky., Richard R. Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, for appellees.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel;

And it appearing that the Findings of Fact by the District Judge are in accordance with the stipulation of the parties herein, and that his Conclusions of Law correctly apply the legal principles applicable thereto;

It is ordered that, for the reasons given by the District Judge in said Conclusions of Law and upon the authority of Aeronautical Lodge v. Campbell, 337 U.S. 521, 69 S.Ct. 1287, 93 L.Ed. 513, and Raulins v. Memphis Union Station Co., 6 Cir., 168 F.2d 466, the judgment of the District Court, herein appealed from, is affirmed. 92 F. Supp. 770.


Summaries of

Gregory v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 17, 1951
191 F.2d 856 (6th Cir. 1951)
Case details for

Gregory v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:Harry GREGORY et al., Appellants, v. LOUISVILLE NASHVILLE RAILROAD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 17, 1951

Citations

191 F.2d 856 (6th Cir. 1951)

Citing Cases

Sularz v. Minneapolis, R

It appears that an assertion of a strong or high probability of advancement was not successful even prior to…