From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenberg v. Glickman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1944
268 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

October 30, 1944.


Action to recover damages for alleged fraud in inducing plaintiff to enter into a contract for the construction and purchase of a dwelling house, and for negligence. Order granting in part and denying in part appellants' motion to dismiss the three causes of action modified on the law by striking from the ordering paragraph the words "pleaded against the defendant, Joseph J. Glickman." As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs, with leave to plaintiff, within twenty days from the entry of the order hereon, to plead anew, if so advised. Close, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs in the determination dismissing the third cause of action as to both defendants, but votes further to modify the order by granting the motion to dismiss the second cause of action also, being of the opinion that as alleged, that cause of action is insufficient in law. ( Drydock Knitting Mills, Inc., v. Queens Machine Corp., 254 App. Div. 568; Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co., 276 N.Y. 259; People v. New York World's Fair 1939 Inc. [ No. 1], 259 App. Div. 739. ) [See post, p. 987.]


Summaries of

Greenberg v. Glickman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1944
268 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Greenberg v. Glickman

Case Details

Full title:CELIA GREENBERG, Respondent, v. JOSEPH J. GLICKMAN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)