From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenan v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1988
140 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 16, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the defendant City of New York's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to make out a prima facie case is denied, and a new trial is granted as between the plaintiff and the defendant City of New York, with costs to abide the event.

The instant action arose out of an incident which occurred at 2:30 A.M. on February 6, 1982. The plaintiff testified that he drove his car through a red light at the intersection of Broadway and Roosevelt Avenue. He then proceeded to the Brooklyn Queens Expressway (hereinafter the BQE) and entered the right lane. Shortly thereafter, and while still in the right lane, plaintiff was ordered to stop his car by a police officer driving a marked police car. The police officer parked his car several feet behind plaintiff's car in the right lane of the BQE. After the plaintiff identified himself, another police officer arrived several minutes later in a second police car, and parked his car several feet behind the first police car, again in the right lane of the BQE. The plaintiff was thereafter handcuffed and ordered to stand behind his car. The plaintiff did so for several minutes, facing oncoming traffic. None of the officers put flares or cones in the roadway. Thereafter, a car driven by the defendant Brown collided with the second police car, which was propelled into the first police car, which in turn struck the plaintiff, who suffered injuries.

Viewing this evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, as we are required to do (see, Lipsius v White, 91 A.D.2d 271; Candelier v City of New York, 129 A.D.2d 145, 147), we conclude that questions of fact exist on this record as to whether the defendant City of New York, through its police officers, acted reasonably under the circumstances to protect the plaintiff's safety and whether any negligence on the part of the defendant City of New York was the proximate cause of the accident (see, Thomas v State of New York, 46 N.Y.2d 1043, 1044; Parvi v City of Kingston, 41 N.Y.2d 553, 559-560; Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308, 315-316, rearg denied 52 N.Y.2d 784, 829). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Greenan v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1988
140 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Greenan v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GREENAN, Appellant, v. CAROL BROWN, Defendant, and CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Once again, there was a strong dissent, urging that the officer had employed reasonable care and stressing…

Dolne v. Village of Ossining

The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal…