From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Studen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 25, 1993
622 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-0344.

August 25, 1993.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Lawrence L. Korda, Judge.

Stuart E. Soff of The Law Offices of Stuart E. Soff and Associates, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Arthur J. England, Jr., and Steven M. Goldsmith of Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen Quentel, P.A., Miami, for appellee.


REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in entering a temporary injunction without making the findings required under Rule 1.610(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and then in denying dissolution thereof without conducting any evidentiary hearing. Upon remand, any orders entered should be in compliance with Rule 1.610(c). See Russo v. Romano, 591 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. Fairchild, 455 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Green v. Studen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 25, 1993
622 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Green v. Studen

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND ELLIS GREEN, APPELLANT, v. JOAN LILIAN STUDEN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 25, 1993

Citations

622 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Premier Lab Supply v. Chemplex Indus

Failure to include specific reasons for issuing the injunction has resulted in reversals of temporary…