From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 21, 2021
190 A.D.3d 1169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

530571

01-21-2021

In the Matter of Shawn GREEN, Appellant, v. Earl BELL, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Shawn Green, Peekskill, appellant pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Owen Demuth of counsel), for respondent.


Shawn Green, Peekskill, appellant pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Owen Demuth of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bruening, J.), entered October 7, 2019 in Clinton County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition.

Petitioner attempted to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging, among other things, various prison disciplinary determinations and seeking an order compelling disclosure of certain information. Supreme Court directed petitioner to serve an affidavit of service with the Supreme Court Clerk's office on or before June 28, 2019. Thereafter, petitioner failed to file the requisite affidavit of service. As a result, by decision filed October 7, 2019, the court, on its own motion, dismissed the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction. Petitioner appeals.

We affirm. "It is well established that failure of an inmate to comply with the directives set forth in an order to show cause will result in dismissal of the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction, unless the inmate demonstrates that imprisonment presented obstacles beyond his or her control which prevented compliance" ( Matter of Simpson v. Annucci, 175 A.D.3d 1694, 1695, 108 N.Y.S.3d 542 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Davis v. Prack, 136 A.D.3d 1092, 1092, 23 N.Y.S.3d 757 [2016] ). As noted by Supreme Court, petitioner made no such showing in order to excuse his failure to comply with the directive in the order to show cause. Accordingly, the court properly dismissed the petition (see Matter of Sharp v. Annucci, 164 A.D.3d 1580, 1581, 84 N.Y.S.3d 596 [2018] ; Matter of Barnes v. Annucci, 144 A.D.3d 1286, 1287, 40 N.Y.S.3d 284 [2016] ; Matter of Davis v. Prack, 136 A.D.3d at 1093, 23 N.Y.S.3d 757 ; Matter of DeFilippo v. Fischer, 85 A.D.3d 1421, 1422, 924 N.Y.S.2d 860 [2011], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 711, 2011 WL 4835694 [2011] ).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Green v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 21, 2021
190 A.D.3d 1169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Green v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Shawn Green, Appellant, v. Earl Bell, as Superintendent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 21, 2021

Citations

190 A.D.3d 1169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
190 A.D.3d 1169
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 344

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Rodriguez

We affirm. "An [incarcerated individual's] failure to serve papers as directed by an order to show cause…