From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Great Neck Obstetrics, Gynecology v. Bellucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 28, 1995
218 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

August 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

When, as here, findings of fact rest in a large measure on the credibility of the witnesses, the decision of the trial court should not be disturbed on appeal unless its conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495).

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant, Eleanor T. Bellucci, did not know that the third-party defendant, Terry Rifkin, had abandoned his original plan to compensate her on a percentage basis until February 25, 1990. As a result, the defendant could not have assented to the changed terms until that time.

We have considered the parties' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Great Neck Obstetrics, Gynecology v. Bellucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 28, 1995
218 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Great Neck Obstetrics, Gynecology v. Bellucci

Case Details

Full title:GREAT NECK OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY, P.C., Appellant-Respondent, v. ELEANOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 28, 1995

Citations

218 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
631 N.Y.S.2d 75

Citing Cases

Volk v. MLD Home Remodeling Corp.

The determination of the trial court that the Plaintiff's in Action Nos. 1 and 3 and the plaintiff in Action…

Southampton Commons v. Southampton Associates

After a nonjury trial, the court found that the evidence offered by the sponsor was more credible and…