From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grazin v. Rockford Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Mar 29, 2017
391 P.3d 914 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

A157246

03-29-2017

Eric J. GRAZIN, Petitioner, v. ROCKFORD CORPORATION and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents.

Julene M. Quinn, Albany, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Jerald P. Keene, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Rockford Corporation. With him on the brief was Oregon Workers' Compensation Institute, LLC. Denise G. Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent Department of Consumer and Business Services.


Julene M. Quinn, Albany, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Jerald P. Keene, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Rockford Corporation. With him on the brief was Oregon Workers' Compensation Institute, LLC.

Denise G. Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent Department of Consumer and Business Services.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

PER CURIAMClaimant settled his workers' compensation claim, in part, through a claim disposition agreement (CDA) under ORS 656.236(1)(a). When the insurer, Liberty Northwest, delayed payment of compensation under the CDA, claimant sought attorney fees and penalties under ORS 656.262(11)(a). The Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services ultimately denied claimant's request, concluding that, under ORS 656.236(1)(a), claimant waived his right to attorney fees and penalties because he did not expressly reserve that right in the CDA.

ORS 656.236(1)(a) provides, in part:

"Unless otherwise specified, a disposition resolves all matters and all rights to compensation, attorney fees and penalties potentially arising out of claims, except medical services, regardless of the conditions stated in the agreement."

--------

On judicial review of the director's final order, claimant argues that ORS 656.236(1)(a) is silent on the issue of waiver of attorney fees and penalties under the circumstances presented here and that, in any event, he did not waive his right to fees and penalties under the CDA because the insurer breached that agreement by delaying compensation. In Stoltz v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. , 284 Or.App. 575, 393 P.3d 239 (2017), decided today, we rejected those identical arguments. In that case, we concluded that, under ORS 656.236(1)(a), a claimant who settles a claim through a CDA waives the right to seek attorney fees and penalties for delayed compensation unless that right is reserved in the CDA. Id. at 580-81, 393 P.3d at 242. Because claimant in this case did not reserve his right to seek attorney fees and penalties in the CDA, that right was waived under the statute.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Grazin v. Rockford Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Mar 29, 2017
391 P.3d 914 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Grazin v. Rockford Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Eric J. GRAZIN, Petitioner, v. ROCKFORD CORPORATION and Department of…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Mar 29, 2017

Citations

391 P.3d 914 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
284 Or. App. 613