From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graybiel v. Consolidated Assns., LTD

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jun 11, 1936
14 Cal.App.2d 547 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)

Opinion

Docket No. 1806.

June 11, 1936.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. J.A. Allen, Judge. Motion denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Halbert Stone for Appellant.

Samuel Schwartz for Respondent.


This is a motion by respondent to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that appellant failed to file his points and authorities within the time specified in rule I of the Rules for the Supreme Court and the District Courts of Appeal. The penalty for breach of this rule is found in rule V.

[1] The clerk's transcript on appeal was filed on April 11, 1936, the notice of motion to dismiss on May 14, 1936, and the appellant's opening brief on June 6, 1936. The motion to dismiss was calendared on June 9, 1936. The filing of the brief before the hearing of the motion has been held sufficient compliance with the rules to justify the denial of the motion. ( Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal.App. 55 [ 297 P. 564].)

The motion to dismiss is denied.

Barnard, P.J., and Jennings, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Graybiel v. Consolidated Assns., LTD

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jun 11, 1936
14 Cal.App.2d 547 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)
Case details for

Graybiel v. Consolidated Assns., LTD

Case Details

Full title:WM. N. GRAYBIEL, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED ASSOCIATIONS, LTD. (a…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 11, 1936

Citations

14 Cal.App.2d 547 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)
58 P.2d 665

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Krumm

[1a] It is argued that regardless of defendants' delay both in the payment of the fee prescribed for the…

VITRANO v. WESTGATE SEA PRODUCTS CO

Similar circumstances have been held sufficient to justify the denial of such a motion. ( Toth v.…