From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. NH Department of Corrections

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jun 23, 2021
20-cv-152-PB (D.N.H. Jun. 23, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-152-PB

06-23-2021

Jeffrey M. Gray v. NH Department of Corrections et al

Jeffrey M. Gray, pro se.


Jeffrey M. Gray, pro se.

ORDER

Paul Barbadoro, United States District Judge.

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 8, 2021, dismiss Mr. Gray's equal protection, ADA, Rehabilitation Act, and RLUIPA claims against all defendants, dismiss his First Amendment claim to the extent it is asserted against the DOC, and drop the DOC from this action. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).


Summaries of

Gray v. NH Department of Corrections

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jun 23, 2021
20-cv-152-PB (D.N.H. Jun. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Gray v. NH Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey M. Gray v. NH Department of Corrections et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jun 23, 2021

Citations

20-cv-152-PB (D.N.H. Jun. 23, 2021)

Citing Cases

Letourneau v. R.I. Dep't of Corr.

However, while I recommend that the RLUIPA claim should survive the motion to dismiss, the law is clear that…