From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Golden Gate Nat'l Recreation Area

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 11, 2013
No. C-08-00722 EDL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. C-08-00722 EDL

03-11-2013

LORI GRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, et al., Defendants.

LAURENCE PARADIS (CA BAR NO. 122336) STUART SEABORN (CA BAR NO. 198590) CHRISTINE CHUANG (CA BAR NO. 257214) DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES Attorneys for Plaintiffs BRIAN G. KENNEDY (DC BAR NO. 228726) BONNIE PROBER (NY BAR NO. 4216461) JONATHAN G. COOPER (DC BAR NO. 999764) JESSE Z. GRAUMAN (VA BAR NO. 76782) JOHN K. THEIS (IL BAR NO. 6287528) United States Department of Justice, Civil Division Federal Programs Branch Attorneys for Defendants


LAURENCE PARADIS (CA BAR NO. 122336)
STUART SEABORN (CA BAR NO. 198590)
CHRISTINE CHUANG (CA BAR NO. 257214)
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

BRIAN G. KENNEDY (DC BAR NO. 228726)
BONNIE PROBER (NY BAR NO. 4216461)
JONATHAN G. COOPER (DC BAR NO. 999764)
JESSE Z. GRAUMAN (VA BAR NO. 76782)
JOHN K. THEIS (IL BAR NO. 6287528)
United States Department of Justice, Civil Division
Federal Programs Branch
Attorneys for Defendants

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SETTING ADDITIONAL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REFERRAL TO A MAGISTRATE

JUDGE FOR MEDIATION AS MODIFIED

INTRODUCTION

In light of the Court's February 20, 2013 Order on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment, Plaintiffs and Defendants met and conferred regarding next steps in the case. The parties believe that a case management conference would be appropriate to discuss with the Court the next steps in the litigation. Defense counsel, who will be traveling from the District of Columbia, are available during the first week of April if the Court has any available time that week. Otherwise, the parties request the matter be set for the next available time on the Court's calendar.

Additionally, given that the Court's Order limited the scope of the park areas at issue in the case, the parties are willing to engage in additional settlement discussions regarding Plaintiffs' allegations of barriers involving access to GGNRA programs and facilities in the remaining park areas at issue. The parties therefore submit the following stipulation and proposed order.

STIPULATION

The Parties stipulate that this case be referred to a magistrate judge in this district pursuant to the Northern District of California's Alternative Dispute Resolution Program for mediation.

The Parties also request an additional case management conference be scheduled for the first week of April 2013 or later if that week is not available on the Court's calendar.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES

______________________

Laurence Paradis

Attorney for Plaintiffs

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

______________________

Brian Kennedy

Attorney for Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties' stipulation set forth above, the Court hereby schedules a case management conference in this matter on April 17, 2013, at 10:00. a.m.

The Court additionally refers this matter to the Northern District's Alternative Dispute Resolution Program for mediation with a United States Magistrate Jacqueline Scott Corley Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Gray v. Golden Gate Nat'l Recreation Area

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 11, 2013
No. C-08-00722 EDL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Gray v. Golden Gate Nat'l Recreation Area

Case Details

Full title:LORI GRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

No. C-08-00722 EDL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)