From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Zipern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

April, 1931.


Judgment as against defendants Zipern and Robins reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The record herein does not establish such a condition of the metal door step as would afford a basis for a finding of negligence on the part of the said defendants, who maintained it, especially in a case where the evidence does not disclose that the plaintiff slipped upon a portion of the step said to have been worn smooth. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grant v. Zipern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Grant v. Zipern

Case Details

Full title:HELEN E. GRANT, Respondent, Appellant, v. ABRAHAM ZIPERN and ISIDORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1931

Citations

233 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)