From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. Heit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 28, 1997
242 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

August 28, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.)


The Special Referee's findings, including those concerning the value of the parties' respective contributions in satisfying partnership liabilities after dissolution, are substantially supported by the record and should not be disturbed (see, Barr v Barr, 232 A.D.2d 316). The sanctions imposed on defendant, an attorney, for signing her attorney's name on two affirmations, and on defendant's attorney for permitting this violation of CPLR 2106, are appropriate. We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Grant v. Heit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 28, 1997
242 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Grant v. Heit

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA A. GRANT, Respondent, v. JULIA P. HEIT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 28, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 29

Citing Cases

Frankel v. Hirsch

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The trial court's determinations as to the date of…