Opinion
April 8, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiff-respondent and third-party defendant-respondent.
Upon our review of the relevant factors in this case, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff, Allied Stores Corporation, to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of forum non conveniens ( see, CPLR 327; see generally, Banco Ambrosiano, S.p.A. v. Artoc Bank Trust, 62 N.Y.2d 65, 73; Islamic Republic of Iran v. Pahlavi, 62 N.Y.2d 474, 478-479, cert denied 469 U.S. 1108). Miller, J.P., Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.