From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jan 29, 2016
189 So. 3d 187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D14–3590.

01-29-2016

GRAND RESERVE AT TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and Business Law Group, P.A., Appellants, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation Mortgage Pass–Through Certificates, Series 2006–AF1, Appellee.

Jacob A. Brainard and Scott C. Davis of Business Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants. Todd A. Armbruster of Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.


Jacob A. Brainard and Scott C. Davis of Business Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants.

Todd A. Armbruster of Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order on appeal in all respects save one. Upon concession of error by Appellee, we reverse the imposition of costs the circuit court awarded under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2014), as this statute “does not provide a mechanism for recovering costs.” See Pronman v. Styles, 163 So.3d 535, 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citing Santini v. Cleveland Clinic Fla., 65 So.3d 22, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). We remand this case for the court to strike the provision of costs from its order.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

WALLACE, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jan 29, 2016
189 So. 3d 187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:GRAND RESERVE AT TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and BUSINESS LAW…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 29, 2016

Citations

189 So. 3d 187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)