From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Tallent

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 30, 1976
224 S.E.2d 98 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

51588.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 14, 1976.

DECIDED JANUARY 30, 1976.

Action on note. Walker Superior Court. Before Judge Painter.

Eugene S. Taylor, Thomas M. Finn, for appellants.

Hatcher Daniel, Ross L. Hatcher, III, for appellee.


This appeal was transferred here by the Supreme Court. Graham v. Tallent, 235 Ga. 47 ( 218 S.E.2d 799). Enumeration of error 1, which complains that the trial court, sitting without a jury, failed to find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law as required by CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)), is meritorious. Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 ( 215 S.E.2d 471).

We remand the appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made separately, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal. Leasing International, Inc. v. Plemons, 136 Ga. App. 455.

Appeal remanded with direction. Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 14, 1976 — DECIDED JANUARY 30, 1976.


Summaries of

Graham v. Tallent

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 30, 1976
224 S.E.2d 98 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Graham v. Tallent

Case Details

Full title:GRAHAM et al. v. TALLENT

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 30, 1976

Citations

224 S.E.2d 98 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
224 S.E.2d 98

Citing Cases

White v. Johnson

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Division 1 of this opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial…

Fred R. Surface Associates, Inc. v. Worozbyt

The Supreme Court has firmly and squarely held that findings of fact and conclusions of law are mandatory…