From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 28, 1966
25 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Summary

stating that habeas is not available to secure return of property

Summary of this case from Burgos v. Hopkins

Opinion

March 28, 1966


This appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Chemung County, dated July 14, 1964, denying an application for the return of personal property, entitled "Writ of Habeas Corpus". The sole purpose of the writ of habeas corpus is to inquire into the validity of petitioner's detention, and it is not available to secure the return of property (CPLR 7002, subd. [a]; People ex rel. Tatra v. McNeill, 19 A.D.2d 845). Order affirmed, without costs. Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Graham v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 28, 1966
25 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

stating that habeas is not available to secure return of property

Summary of this case from Burgos v. Hopkins
Case details for

Graham v. State

Case Details

Full title:BURTON GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Lavery

.Ct. 1083, 175 L.Ed.2d 907 [2010]; Cetacean Community v. Bush, 386 F.3d 1169, 1178 [9th Cir.2004]; Tilikum ex…

Burgos v. Hopkins

This conclusion is supported by case law, because New York courts have not allowed in a habeas proceeding the…