From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Boyd

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Mar 2, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-633-TMH [WO] (M.D. Ala. Mar. 2, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-633-TMH [WO].

March 2, 2009


ORDER


There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed herein on January 21, 2009 (Doc. 11), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 11) be ADOPTED;
2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner on August 6, 2008, be DENIED; and,
3. This cause of action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred.


Summaries of

Graham v. Boyd

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Mar 2, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-633-TMH [WO] (M.D. Ala. Mar. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Graham v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:DONNIE EUGENE GRAHAM, #207827, Petitioner, v. LOUIS BOYD, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 2, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-633-TMH [WO] (M.D. Ala. Mar. 2, 2009)

Citing Cases

Steen v. Williamson

F. Preston, and Dunne & McPike, for Respondent.          The defendant is not liable for the injuries…