Opinion
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-506.
August 19, 2011
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
This matter came before the Court on Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. This Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation recommending that the Court deny the petition. Doc. 14
Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within 14 days after service. Petitioner was further granted a 60 day extension to respond to the report and recommendation. Petitioner did not file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Petition for Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.