From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graepel v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 1986
119 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 28, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.).


Judgment reversed, with costs, and motion denied.

The language in the collective bargaining agreement does not resolve the question whether the "Platoon Duty Schedule" applicable to correction officers satisfies the contractual requirement that "[a]ll officers and employees" covered by the agreement receive compensatory time off for holidays which fall on their scheduled days off. The evidence in the record is insufficient to resolve the ambiguity, and the matter should therefore be determined at a trial by resort to extrinsic evidence concerning the intentions and understandings of the parties at the time of the agreement (see, Lachs v. Fidelity Cas. Co., 306 N.Y. 357, 364; Piedmont Hotel Co. v. Nettleton Co., 263 N.Y. 25, 29; 22 N.Y. Jur 2d, Contracts, § 189, at 25). Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Graepel v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 1986
119 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Graepel v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:GLEN GRAEPEL et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Lui v. Park Ridge at Terryville Ass'n

The language of the contract does not resolve such issues as whether the agreement initially provided for the…

Leon v. Lukash

As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. When the language of a contract is…