Opinion
2012-03-8
White, Fleischner & Fino, LLP, New York (Evan A. Richman of counsel), for appellants. Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP, New York (Matthew Hearle of counsel), for respondent.
White, Fleischner & Fino, LLP, New York (Evan A. Richman of counsel), for appellants. Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP, New York (Matthew Hearle of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July 18, 2011, which denied the motion of defendant Board of Directors and its individual members to dismiss the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We accept the allegations of the complaint as true and construe the inferences that may be drawn therefrom in plaintiff's favor, as we must on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 ( see Leon v. Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87–88, 614 N.Y.S.2d 972, 638 N.E.2d 511 [1994]; DeMicco Brothers, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., 8 A.D.3d 99, 779 N.Y.S.2d 10 [2004] ). We find that the complaint sufficiently states a claim against the Condominium Board and its individual members for trespass and misappropriation of property. In the complaint, plaintiff asserts that defendants directed employees of the condominium to continue to trespass on plaintiff's personal property and disrupt its business in bad faith and in furtherance of their personal “grudge” against plaintiff or its principal. This allegation of bad faith and a breach of fiduciary duty, not protected by the business judgment rule, is sufficient to withstand the motion to dismiss ( see Matter of Y & O Holdings (N.Y.) v. Board of Mgrs. of Exec. Plaza Condominium, 278 A.D.2d 173, 717 N.Y.S.2d 602 [2000] ).