From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GP v. Lee Cnty. Sch. Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jun 25, 2018
Case No: 2:15-cv-728-FtM-38CM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 25, 2018)

Opinion

Case No: 2:15-cv-728-FtM-38CM

06-25-2018

GP, minor child by and through her Mother, JP Plaintiff, v. LEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant.


ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 96) on Defendant Lee County School Board's Motion to Tax Costs (Doc. 88). Judge Mirando recommends that the Motion to Tax Costs be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. 96). No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the period to do so has lapsed. This matter is ripe for review.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and on consideration of Judge Mirando's findings and recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation. Defendant Lee County School Board shall be granted a total of $5,602.25 in costs.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 96) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.

2. Defendant Lee County School Board's Motion to Tax Costs (Doc. 88) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant Lee County School Board is awarded $5,602.25 in costs.

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter an Amended Judgment accordingly.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 25th day of June 2018.

/s/ _________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

GP v. Lee Cnty. Sch. Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jun 25, 2018
Case No: 2:15-cv-728-FtM-38CM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 25, 2018)
Case details for

GP v. Lee Cnty. Sch. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:GP, minor child by and through her Mother, JP Plaintiff, v. LEE COUNTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2018

Citations

Case No: 2:15-cv-728-FtM-38CM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 25, 2018)

Citing Cases

Jean-Pierre v. Naples Cmty. Hosp.

"Mediation costs are recoverable, however, where the case management and scheduling order provides that they…