From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 4, 1957
96 Ga. App. 742 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)

Opinion

36672.

DECIDED DECEMBER 4, 1957.

Invasion of right of privacy. Before Judge Moore. Fulton Superior Court. January 25, 1957.

Hurt, Gaines, Baird, Peek Peabody, for plaintiff in error.

J. William Gibson, Moise, Post Gardner, for parties at interest not parties to record.

Dennis F. Jones, contra.


The Supreme Court of Georgia in Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst, 213 Ga. 682 ( 100 S.E.2d 881) having reversed the judgment of this court in Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst, 96 Ga. App. 48 ( 99 S.E.2d 475), the judgment of affirmance originally rendered by this court is hereby vacated, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed in conformance to the rulings and judgment of the Supreme Court.

Judgment reversed. Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

DECIDED DECEMBER 4, 1957.


Summaries of

Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 4, 1957
96 Ga. App. 742 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)
Case details for

Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst

Case Details

Full title:GOULDMAN-TABER PONTIAC, INC. v. ZERBST

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 4, 1957

Citations

96 Ga. App. 742 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)
101 S.E.2d 203

Citing Cases

Purcell v. Allstate Ins. Co.

(Emphasis supplied.) Copenhaver v. United American Inv. Co., 96 Ga. App. 562, 566 ( 101 S.E.2d 203) (1957).…

Midwest Glass Co. v. Stanford Development Co.

We believe that Midwest, having a legitimate interest in the context of rendering services without receiving…