From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gould v. Paillard Products

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Mar 31, 1958
139 A.2d 864 (D.C. 1958)

Opinion

No. 2115.

Argued January 13, 1958.

Decided March 31, 1958. Rehearing Denied April 11, 1958.

APPEAL FROM MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIVIL DIVISION, CATHERINE B. KELLY, J.

George E. Gould, pro se.

Philip Shinberg, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellee, but filed no brief.

Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.


Appellant was sued on a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York. He defended on the ground that the New York judgment was invalid. The trial court found against appellant, denied his motion for new trial, and entered judgment against him on October 17, 1956. No appeal was taken from the judgment. On August 2, 1957, after appellant had been ordered to answer written interrogatories relating to his assets, he filed a motion for "dismissal" of the judgment. That motion was denied and this appeal is from its denial.

The appeal must be dismissed. Even if there be any merit in appellant's contention regarding the invalidity of the New York judgment, it is now too late to consider it. The question could and should have been brought here by direct appeal from the local judgment entered on the foreign judgment. Time for such appeal has long passed, and the belated motion to dismiss or vacate the judgment presents no question which can be reviewed by this court. MacVey v. MacVey, D.C.Mun.App., 98 A.2d 794.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Gould v. Paillard Products

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Mar 31, 1958
139 A.2d 864 (D.C. 1958)
Case details for

Gould v. Paillard Products

Case Details

Full title:George E. GOULD, Appellant, v. PAILLARD PRODUCTS, Inc., a corporation…

Court:Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Date published: Mar 31, 1958

Citations

139 A.2d 864 (D.C. 1958)