rejecting argument that service under Rule 4(f) was invalid because it did not comply with the Hague Convention, as that "agreement does not displace Rule 4(f)"
Summary of this case from Gamboa v. Ford Motor Co.No. 18–119.
11-13-2018
GOTECH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, et al., petitioners, v. NAGRAVISION SA.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
rejecting argument that service under Rule 4(f) was invalid because it did not comply with the Hague Convention, as that "agreement does not displace Rule 4(f)"
Summary of this case from Gamboa v. Ford Motor Co.Full title:GOTECH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, et al., petitioners, v…
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Nov 13, 2018
The undersigned therefore recommends that the United States District Judge quash Prem's email service. Prior…
Gamboa v. Ford Motor Co.Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Int'l Interlink , 284 F.3d 1007, 1015 (9th Cir. 2002) ("By all indications,…