From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorman v. Wells Mfg. Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Aug 15, 2003
340 F.3d 543 (8th Cir. 2003)

Summary

holding that plaintiff's pregnancy-related nausea, vomiting, dizziness, severe headaches, and fatigue did not qualify as disabilities under the ADEA

Summary of this case from Heather Appel v. Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Opinion

No. 02-2978.

Submitted: May 16, 2003.

Filed: August 15, 2003.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, James E. Gritzner, J.

Jeffrey M. Lipman, argued, Des Moines, IA, for appellant.

Helen C. Adams, argued, Des Moines, IA, for appellee.

Before BOWMAN, BYE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN, District Judge.

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.


Leelyn Gorman was employed by Wells Manufacturing Corp. in Centerville, Iowa. In September of 1998, she missed eight days of work, was 25 minutes late for work one day and four hours late another. Pursuant to Wells' policy, she presented a disability certificate from her doctor for the absence. The doctor who signed the disability certificate later informed Wells that he had not asked Gorman to stay home; he did not know of any disability complications (Gorman was pregnant) during the days in question; and that Gorman had been warned by his office about malingering. Gorman was then fired.

On appeal, Gorman argues that the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to Wells on her ADA, Title VII, and Iowa Civil Rights Act disability and sex discrimination claims. We have conducted a de novo review of the entire record, and have carefully reviewed the briefs and arguments of counsel and we conclude that there was no error in the District Court's decision granting summary judgment. See Whitley v. Peer Review Sys., Inc., 221 F.3d 1053, 1055 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.


Summaries of

Gorman v. Wells Mfg. Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Aug 15, 2003
340 F.3d 543 (8th Cir. 2003)

holding that plaintiff's pregnancy-related nausea, vomiting, dizziness, severe headaches, and fatigue did not qualify as disabilities under the ADEA

Summary of this case from Heather Appel v. Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Case details for

Gorman v. Wells Mfg. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Leelyn J. GORMAN, Appellant, v. WELLS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Aug 15, 2003

Citations

340 F.3d 543 (8th Cir. 2003)

Citing Cases

Roberds v. AT&T Operations, Inc.

Daugherty, 231 S.W.3d at 818. In Daugherty, the court relied on federal cases under the Americans with…

Hesse v. Mo. Dep't of Corr.

Plaintiff does not dispute that absenteeism is a legitimate non-retaliatory reason for her termination. See…