From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Air Liquide-Big Three Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jul 10, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-396-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 10, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-396-SDD-RLB

07-10-2013

CAROLYN GORDON, ET AL. v. AIR LIQUIDE-BIG THREE INC., ET AL.


RULING

The Court, after carefully considering the Petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated June 19, 2013, to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 13) is DENIED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, July 10th, 2013.

______________________

SHELLY D. DICK , DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Gordon v. Air Liquide-Big Three Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jul 10, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-396-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Gordon v. Air Liquide-Big Three Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN GORDON, ET AL. v. AIR LIQUIDE-BIG THREE INC., ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jul 10, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-396-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 10, 2013)

Citing Cases

Rowell v. Shell Chem. LP

In determining whether a defendant has properly shown from the face of the plaintiff's pleadings that the…

Nolan v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

In deciding whether a defendant has made a proper showing, courts deciding similar cases evaluate the size of…