From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gootman v. Village of Haverstraw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 6, 1994
200 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 6, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.).


On February 20, 1987, plaintiff Barbara Gootman slipped and fell in a hallway of the Village Hall of the Village of Haverstraw, Rockland County. She and her husband brought this action against the Village and the company responsible for cleaning and maintaining the area where she fell, seeking to recover for injuries allegedly resulting from the fall and for derivative losses. After issue was joined and depositions taken, both defendants' motions for summary judgment were granted; plaintiffs appeal.

The mere fact that a floor has been rendered "slippery" by the application of wax or polish is not sufficient to support a claim of negligence. To prevail, a plaintiff must demonstrate not only that the floor on which he or she slipped was "shiny" or that it had been waxed, but also that the wax or polish had been negligently applied (see, Lowrey v. Cumberland Farms, 162 A.D.2d 777, 778; Paddock v. Church of St. Barnabas, 24 A.D.2d 716). Excerpts from Gootman's deposition testimony, submitted by defendants in support of their motions, establish that there was no foreign material or wax residue on the floor. Given that plaintiffs have failed to rebut this prima facie showing with any evidence that the cleaning or waxing of the floor was performed in a negligent manner (compare, Manning v New York Tel. Co., 157 A.D.2d 264, 266), their complaint was properly dismissed.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.


Summaries of

Gootman v. Village of Haverstraw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 6, 1994
200 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Gootman v. Village of Haverstraw

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA GOOTMAN et al., Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF HAVERSTRAW et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 6, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 411

Citing Cases

Weeks v. Ara Services

In this diversity suit, New York law is applicable; New York precedent holds that "the fact that a floor is…

Thomas v. Caldor's

Review of that affidavit establishes it contains no statement which could be construed to establish the…