From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1923
142 N.E. 287 (N.Y. 1923)

Opinion

Argued May 7, 1923

Decided May 29, 1923

Sidney R. Fleisher for appellant.

William Paul Allen and Samuel C. Coleman for Lamport Holt, Ltd., respondent.

Alfred T. Tompkins and J. Arthur Hilton for Atlantic Basin Iron Works, Inc., respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: CRANE, J.


Summaries of

Goodwin v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1923
142 N.E. 287 (N.Y. 1923)
Case details for

Goodwin v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:CONSTANCE GOODWIN, as Administratrix of the Estate of ALEXANDER GOODWIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1923

Citations

142 N.E. 287 (N.Y. 1923)
142 N.E. 287

Citing Cases

Palm v. New York, N.H. H.R. Co.

Those New York cases holding for the defendant state no contrary rule; they actually involved situations of a…