From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin ex rel. Atkinson v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON
Mar 13, 2015
Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-11582 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 13, 2015)

Summary

describing as "fundamentally flawed" the plaintiff's argument that, because the ALJ found a severe impairment at step two, "she was bound to include functional limitations in the RFC finding to account for [the impairment]"

Summary of this case from Crabtree v. Berryhill

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-11582

03-13-2015

MARILYN GOODWIN, on behalf of JENNIFER ANN ATKINSON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert, entered on February 19, 2015; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court deny plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings; grant defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings; affirm the final decision of the Commissioner; dismiss this matter from the court's docket; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein;

2. The plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and it hereby is, denied;

3. The defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted;

4. The final decision of the Commissioner be, and it hereby is, affirmed; and

5. The case be, and hereby is, dismissed from the docket of this court.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record and the United States Magistrate Judge.

DATED: March 13, 2015

/s/_________

John T. Copenhaver, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Goodwin ex rel. Atkinson v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON
Mar 13, 2015
Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-11582 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 13, 2015)

describing as "fundamentally flawed" the plaintiff's argument that, because the ALJ found a severe impairment at step two, "she was bound to include functional limitations in the RFC finding to account for [the impairment]"

Summary of this case from Crabtree v. Berryhill

describing as "fundamentally flawed" the plaintiff's argument that, because the ALJ found a severe impairment at step two, "she was bound to include functional limitations in the RFC finding to account for [the impairment]"

Summary of this case from Propst v. Colvin
Case details for

Goodwin ex rel. Atkinson v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:MARILYN GOODWIN, on behalf of JENNIFER ANN ATKINSON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON

Date published: Mar 13, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-11582 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 13, 2015)

Citing Cases

Propst v. Colvin

A finding of de minimis limitations is not proof that the same limitations have the greater significant and…

Crabtree v. Berryhill

See, e.g., Sykes v. Apfel, 228 F.3d 259, 268 n.12 (3d Cir. 2000).Hughes v. Astrue, No. 1:09CV459, 2011 WL…