From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodright v. Shine

Superior Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1784
1 N.C. 11 (N.C. Super. 1784)

Opinion

(November Term, 1784.)

Where a judgment in ejectment is set aside after the writ of possession has been executed, the Court will issue a writ of restitution of defendant to the possession.

Ejectment. At the last term, judgment was taken by default against the casual ejector, and a writ of habere facias possessionem awarded and executed, and now the judgment was set aside on payment of full costs; Shine making himself a defendant, and agreeing not to delay the trial.


And on motion of ________________ his counsel,

The Court directed a writ to issue to the sheriff, to reinstate Shine in the possession of the premises.

NOTE. — See Beaner v. Pilley, 4 N.C. 329; Bledsoe v. Wilson, 13 N.C. 314.

(12)


Summaries of

Goodright v. Shine

Superior Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1784
1 N.C. 11 (N.C. Super. 1784)
Case details for

Goodright v. Shine

Case Details

Full title:GOODRIGHT ON THE DEM. OF McILWEAN v. SHINE. — 1 Mart., 54

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1784

Citations

1 N.C. 11 (N.C. Super. 1784)

Citing Cases

Healy v. Wostenberg

1 C.J. 244; Harney, Admr. v. Montgomery, 29 Wyo. 362. The order awarding restitution of the premises is…