From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
May 25, 1988
750 S.W.2d 789 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)

Summary

finding intent to cause serious bodily injury or death from defendant's admission that he pointed gun at deceased and pulled the trigger

Summary of this case from McDaniel v. State

Opinion

No. 540-87.

May 25, 1988.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4, Tarrant County, Joe Drago, III, J.

Travis W. Young, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Tim Curry, Dist. Atty., C. Chris Marshall and Betty Stanton, Asst. Dist. Attys., Fort Worth, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of murder. The jury assessed punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for forty three years. Appellant appealed to the Fort Worth Court of Appeals, and the conviction was affirmed. Goodin v. State, 726 S.W.2d 956 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth 1987). Appellant petitioned this Court for discretionary review to determine whether the court of appeals improperly held that the trial court properly refused appellant's requested jury instructions on aiding a suicide, conspiracy to commit murder and mistake of fact.

We have reviewed the decision of the court of appeals and find that the proper result was reached. We do not, however, agree with the Court of Appeals' language indicating that the determination of whether an instruction on a lesser included offense should be given should be based on whether the lesser included offense has elements not required for the primary offense. See generally, Cunningham v. State, 726 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.Cr.App. 1987); Day v. State, 532 S.W.2d 302 (Tex.Cr.App. 1976). We therefore disclaim the language in the court of appeals' opinion which conflicts with Cunningham and Day, supra.

With this disclaimer, appellant's petition for discretionary review is refused. The decision of the court of appeals affirming the conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Goodin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
May 25, 1988
750 S.W.2d 789 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)

finding intent to cause serious bodily injury or death from defendant's admission that he pointed gun at deceased and pulled the trigger

Summary of this case from McDaniel v. State

finding intent to cause serious bodily injury from defendant's admission that he pointed a gun at victim and pulled trigger

Summary of this case from Ramirez v. State

finding intent to cause serious bodily injury from defendant's admission that he pointed a gun at victim and pulled trigger

Summary of this case from Ramirez v. State

finding intent to cause serious bodily injury from the appellant's admission of having pointed firearm at deceased and pulled trigger

Summary of this case from Bishop v. State
Case details for

Goodin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael Wayne GOODIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: May 25, 1988

Citations

750 S.W.2d 789 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. State

TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.08. A comparison of the statutory elements and the indictment reveals that aiding…

T.L. v. Cook Children's Med. Ctr.

Aiding suicide, therefore, "encompasses action which indirectly contributes to another's voluntary suicide,…