From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Good Old Days Tavern, Inc. v. Zwirn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 2000
271 A.D.2d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

April 11, 2000.

Defendant Gerard Zwirn shall pay $5,000 and defendants Joseph Fischer and Ernest H. Hammer shall pay $1,000 each as sanctions and the Clerk of Supreme Court, New York County is directed to enter judgment in such amount in favor of the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection.

NARDELLI, J.P., WILLIAMS, WALLACH, LERNER, JJ.


On December 21, 1999, we affirmed the July 7, 1999 denial of defendants' motion for renewal of their previously denied motion for summary judgment.

The appeal from the July 7, 1999 order was simply another round of frivolity that defendants have used to stymie this action. This Court previously granted plaintiff Day's cross-motion for sanctions and ordered defendants to pay $1,000 to the individual plaintiff to compensate him for the costs in opposing frivolous motions (Good Old Days Tavern v. Zwirn, 261 A.D.2d 288). Undeterred by this sanction, defendants continue to advance meritless arguments and to engage in a course of conduct that is calculated to harass and annoy the plaintiffs. 22 NYCRR § 130-1.1(d) permits this Court's sua sponte imposition of sanctions, costs and attorneys fees against defendants for their continued frivolous conduct.

Accordingly, we impose a sanction in the amount of $5,000 against defendant Gerard Zwirn, and a sanction in the amount of $1,000 each against defendants Joseph Fischer and Ernest Hammer, for their continued frivolous conduct in this action.


Summaries of

Good Old Days Tavern, Inc. v. Zwirn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 2000
271 A.D.2d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Good Old Days Tavern, Inc. v. Zwirn

Case Details

Full title:GOOD OLD DAYS TAVERN, INC. v. ZWIRN, et al

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 11, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 678

Citing Cases

Martin v. Burns

However, the brief of the former attorney for the plaintiff consists almost entirely of a reargument of the…

Caplan v. Tofel

However, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendant's…