From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez-Zavala v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 17, 2013
570 U.S. 901 (2013)

Summary

holding prolongation of a traffic stop based on probable cause due to further questioning by a police officer is reasonable so long as the officer asks questions that hold potential for detecting crime, yet create little or no inconvenience

Summary of this case from United States v. Griffin

Opinion

No. 12–9747.

06-17-2013

Jose GONZALEZ–ZAVALA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Peugh v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2072, 186 L.Ed.2d 84 (2013).


Summaries of

Gonzalez-Zavala v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 17, 2013
570 U.S. 901 (2013)

holding prolongation of a traffic stop based on probable cause due to further questioning by a police officer is reasonable so long as the officer asks questions that hold potential for detecting crime, yet create little or no inconvenience

Summary of this case from United States v. Griffin
Case details for

Gonzalez-Zavala v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Jose GONZALEZ–ZAVALA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jun 17, 2013

Citations

570 U.S. 901 (2013)
133 S. Ct. 2830
186 L. Ed. 2d 881
81 U.S.L.W. 3689

Citing Cases

United States v. Griffin

The court held that questions that hold potential for detecting crime, yet create little or no inconvenience,…

United States v. Coleman

Sanford, 806 F.3d at 958-959. See also United States v. Bueno, 703 F.3d 1053, 1059 n.3 (7th Cir.), vacated in…