From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 21, 1994
638 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2791.

June 21, 1994.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ellen J. Leesfield, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joni Braunstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.


Jorge Esteban Gonzalez appeals his convictions for kidnapping without a firearm, and battery. Pursuant to Mills v. State, 620 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 1993), quoting Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1977), and citing to State v. Franklin, 618 So.2d 171 (Fla. 1993), it is per se reversible error for a trial court to respond to a jury's request for re-instruction without first notifying a defendant and defense counsel, and giving them an opportunity to be heard on the questions presented, regardless of the circumstances. This kind of violation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410 is not subject to a harmless error analysis. Accordingly, upon our consideration and the state's confession of error, the order under review is reversed and the case remanded.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 21, 1994
638 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JORGE ESTEBAN GONZALEZ, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 21, 1994

Citations

638 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. State

It is unrealistic to believe a judge would be equally willing to encompass defense counsel's suggestions in…