From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2012
93 A.D.3d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-22

In the Matter of Wilfredo GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

Wilfredo Gonzalez, Alden, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.


Wilfredo Gonzalez, Alden, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

When a female correction officer approached petitioner's cell early in the morning after calling the count, she observed petitioner standing facing the cell door with his penis in his hand. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in lewd conduct. He was found guilty of the charge at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Dallio v. Fischer, 68 A.D.3d 1380, 1380, 889 N.Y.S.2d 874 [2009]; Matter of Gaines v. Fischer, 67 A.D.3d 1080, 1081, 889 N.Y.S.2d 283 [2009] ). Petitioner's defense that he did not hear the count called due to his hearing impairment and was merely drying himself after urinating presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Darshan v. Bango, 83 A.D.3d 1302, 920 N.Y.S.2d 739 [2011]; Matter of Swinton v. Fischer, 82 A.D.3d 1440, 918 N.Y.S.2d 745 [2011] ). Lastly, upon reviewing the record, we find no merit to petitioner's claim that he was denied a fair and impartial hearing or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias on the part of the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of McGowan v. Fischer, 88 A.D.3d 1038, 1039, 930 N.Y.S.2d 313 [2011]; Matter of Al–Matin v. Brown, 86 A.D.3d 902, 902–903, 927 N.Y.S.2d 468 [2011] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

MERCURE, Acting P.J., ROSE, SPAIN, KAVANAGH and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2012
93 A.D.3d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Wilfredo GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 22, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2137
940 N.Y.S.2d 495

Citing Cases

Collins v. Fischer

This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. We confirm that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty…

In re Dillon

This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony from both its author…