From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Felson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 24, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' request for a missing-witness charge ( see, PJI 1:75) since the testimony of the two doctors would have been merely cumulative ( see, Kane v. Linsky, 156 A.D.2d 333, 334; Levande v. Dines, 153 A.D.2d 671, 672; Getlin v. St. Vincent's Hosp. Med. Ctr., 117 A.D.2d 707, 708).

Contrary to the defendants' assertions on appeal, the damage award did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation ( see, CPLR 5501 [c]).

The defendants' remaining contention is without merit.

Copertino, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Felson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Felson

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA GONZALEZ, Respondent, v. PALMA M. FELSON et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 582

Citing Cases

Komforti v. New York City Transit Auth

Considering the nature of the plaintiff's injuries, the award for past pain and suffering did not deviate…