From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonchoroff v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
Case. No. 11-14607 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case. No. 11-14607

03-27-2013

MICHAEL C. GONCHOROFF, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff filed this action challenging a final decision of Defendant Commissioner denying benefits to Plaintiff. This matter currently comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [dkt 16], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt 14] be denied, that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt 11] be granted in part, that the findings of the Commissioner be reversed and that this matter be remanded for further proceedings. Defendant has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file, the respective motions, and the Report and Recommendation. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonchoroff v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
Case. No. 11-14607 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Gonchoroff v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL C. GONCHOROFF, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

Case. No. 11-14607 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 27, 2013)

Citing Cases

Postell v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

According to plaintiff, the ALJ erred in concluding that plaintiff's severe impairments did not meet or…