From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goncalves v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 3, 2002
290 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

89631

January 3, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Joseph S. Goncalves Jr., Collins, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Laura Etlinger of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and, Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit making threats and conduct involving the threat of violence. The misbehavior report relates that at a time when petitioner was an inmate at Attica Correctional Facility in Wyoming County, he sent a letter to respondent Victor T. Herbert, the facility's Superintendent, wherein he discussed his plans "to assassinate a few of your officers and possibly you". Petitioner stated that he would kill them at close range so they would "see my face before I sho[o]t you in the heart and nail a pair of black gloves to your for[e]head".

At the disciplinary hearing, the misbehavior report was introduced in evidence as was the testimony of the reporting officer. Also in evidence was petitioner's testimony wherein he admitted to having written and sent the letter, explaining that he had done so to express his frustration with his treatment at the hands of certain correction officers in the hope that by doing so, he would be granted a transfer to a different facility. Confidential testimony was presented by a social worker from the Office of Mental Health who had evaluated petitioner and found him not to be psychotic.

We find that the misbehavior report and petitioner's letter, together with the testimony given by the reporting correction officer, the social worker and petitioner himself, were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Troutman v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 862; Matter of Trottie v. Goord, 253 A.D.2d 935). The remaining issues raised herein have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Goncalves v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 3, 2002
290 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Goncalves v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH S. GONCALVES JR., Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 3, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
735 N.Y.S.2d 246

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Chavis v. Goord

We also discern no error in Supreme Court's dismissal of that portion of the petition challenging the…

Green v. Ricks

y relate to the remaining determinations. The first determination, rendered May 19, 2000, found petitioner…