From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goltz v. Art Awning Manufacturing Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

February, 1933.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The alleged error with respect to the charge is not adequately presented on this record. ( Govers v. Hofstatter, 41 App. Div. 384.) It does not appear that the matter complained of prejudicially affected the result.


Summaries of

Goltz v. Art Awning Manufacturing Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Goltz v. Art Awning Manufacturing Company

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM GOLTZ and JOHN BRENGARD, Respondents, v. ART AWNING MANUFACTURING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)