From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Kamen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1979
73 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

December 31, 1979


In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 13, 1979, as, upon granting his motion to compel plaintiff to comply with his notice for discovery and inspection, limited the production of certain records by stating that "Paragraph V, set forth in pages 1 and 2 of the LONG ISLAND JEWISH-HILLSIDE MEDICAL CENTER records be and the same is to be deleted therefrom". Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, the third decretal paragraph is deleted therefrom and it is directed that the portion of the hospital record in question be subject to discovery and inspection. Since the action is based upon a claim of personal injury arising out of medical malpractice, there is no doctor-patient privilege (see Koump v Smith, 25 N.Y.2d 287; Prink v. Rockefeller Center, 48 N.Y.2d 309). Moreover, there is relevant matter contained in the portion of the hospital record deleted by Special Term. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Rabin, Gulotta and Gibbons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Kamen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1979
73 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Kamen

Case Details

Full title:ARLENE GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. DANIEL H. KAMEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1979

Citations

73 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Dale v. Sherman

In our view the court should have ordered unconditional disclosure of the records requested. Having broadly…

Cynthia B v. N Rochelle Hosp

The underlying rationale which requires reversal is that the plaintiff, having placed her mental condition in…