From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Greenberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Sep 1, 1896
18 Misc. 61 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)

Opinion

September, 1896.

Isaac A. Hourwick, for appellant.

Abraham D. Levy, for respondents.


As the action was for wages earned by a female employed other than as a domestic servant, and the amount of damages recovered was less than $10, plaintiff is entitled to $5 additional costs, and the justice should have inserted that amount in the judgment. Consol. Act, chap. 410, Laws 1882, §§ 1424 and 1420. As the respondent does not dispute this, and there is no question upon which a new trial need be ordered, we shall direct that the judgment be modified by adding the $5 additional costs.

Where there is a mere error in a matter of figures and a new trial will not change the result, a judgment may be modified even by increasing the amount of the recovery. Golde v. Whipple Co., 7 A.D. 48; 39 N.Y.S. 964.

The judgment modified accordingly, without costs to either party.

McADAM and BISCHOFF, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified by adding to plaintiff's recovery $5 additional costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Greenberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Sep 1, 1896
18 Misc. 61 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Greenberg

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, v . CHARLES GREENBERG et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Sep 1, 1896

Citations

18 Misc. 61 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)
41 N.Y.S. 21

Citing Cases

United States v. Barteck

WHEREAS, Defendant argues that a limitation to the jurisdiction of conviction should be read into §…

Fischer v. Cohen

As we have power to "reverse, affirm or modify the judgment appealed from" (Code, § 3213), it must be…